Fatcow Icon
Downtown deliveries could be curtailed
by Tom Joyce
Staff Reporter
Oct 04, 2012 | 4936 views | 10 10 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
<p>Tom Joyce | The News</p><p>A truck sits in the left lane of North Main Street Wednesday while its driver, shown to the right, returns from a delivery to a downtown business. City officials will discuss a proposal this afternoon to limit that practice to certain times of the day.</p>

Tom Joyce | The News

A truck sits in the left lane of North Main Street Wednesday while its driver, shown to the right, returns from a delivery to a downtown business. City officials will discuss a proposal this afternoon to limit that practice to certain times of the day.

slideshow

Trucks blocking one lane of North Main Street while parked for deliveries is a common sight in downtown Mount Airy.

But it will become less common if one city official has his way, with the issue to be discussed today during a meeting of the Mount Airy Board of Commissioners which begins at 2 p.m.

“I think Mount Airy’s got a great downtown,” Commissioner Scott Graham said Wednesday, “but at any (given) time of the day when you drive through there, you’re weaving in and out of delivery trucks.”

Typically, with no on-street spaces available, truck drivers will park in one of North Main’s two travel lanes while making deliveries to various businesses downtown. This requires approaching motorists to veer into the opposite lane from where the truck is parked, causing bottlenecks at times.

Graham said he was told by one local woman that she returned to her parked vehicle to find it blocked in by a truck, and looked around for the driver so she could “escape.” The woman eventually found him inside a downtown restaurant — eating lunch.

Along with the inconvenience factor, a risk is posed, the city’s at-large commissioner said. “It can be a safety issue if an emergency vehicle is coming down there.” Trucks of all sizes, including tractor-trailers, make deliveries, he said.

Graham requested that the delivery problem be placed on the agenda for discussion at today’s council meeting, to be held at the Municipal Building.

He supports restricting the practice along North Main Street to only certain times of the day. Graham said Wednesday this could involve requiring on-street deliveries to occur before 9 a.m. or after 6 p.m., although he said that is just a proposal at this point.

Under that scenario, truck drivers could still make their appointed rounds between those times, but would have to park in an off-street municipal lot. “There are two big lots,” Graham said. “They will just have to do the best they can to get to the stores.”

He added, “It’s not our (city officials’) job to give them front-door delivery.”

Graham said he knows of no other cities that allow the practice Mount Airy does now. Drivers are subject to a ticket and large fine for doing so elsewhere, he said.

A Blow Against Business?

Some might argue that lots of delivery trucks downtown is a good thing for a down economy — it means the wheels of commerce are moving.

However, Graham argues that no one will be impacted by the proposed limitations on deliveries but the truck drivers themselves.

“I’ve talked to a number of the businesses on Main Street that get deliveries on a constant basis, and I’ve not had one objection,” he said of reaction to his proposal from owners and operators.

“It’s a problem that can be handled easily.”

Changing traffic patterns and other proposals have been eyed by Mount Airy officials in recent months as a means of making the downtown area more pedestrian-friendly.

“It all goes along with our plans in the retreat,” Graham said of a city government planning session held during the winter when long-range goals were discussed.

“It’s Step One in that process,” he said of the proposal to limit truck deliveries.

Commissioners also have discussed changes that would promote more outside dining downtown along with tree plantings and other landscaping enhancements.

Other Business

Also at this afternoon’s meeting, Mount Airy officials are scheduled to:

• Consider the approval of a mutual-aid agreement that governs situations in which the Mount Airy Police Department renders assistance to neighboring law enforcement agencies.

“We’re just updating,” Police Chief Dale Watson said Wednesday regarding a need to make current an agreement adopted in 2003. State statutes require such a document specifying the rules and guidelines to be followed by city police personnel in working with other agencies.

No major changes are included in the update, Watson said.

• Approve an appointment to the board that oversees the Housing Authority of the City of Mount Airy, which manages public housing in the municipality. David James Beal has been suggested as a replacement for Bill G. Belton, who died on Aug. 10 with more than three years of his term remaining.

• Give special recognition to Belk Department Store as part on an ongoing city government program to honor older local businesses.

• Consider a resolution accepting an unopened portion of Creed Street by the city and formally opening its 30-foot right of way for public use. This action would improve the “connectivity of the community” along with making access easier by police, fire and public works personnel, according to a city government memo.

Creed Street is located off Rockford Street and runs parallel to East Haymore Street.

Reach Tom Joyce at 719-1924 or tjoyce@heartlandpublications.com.

Comments
(10)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
DarinMoser
|
October 05, 2012
21 Truths About Agenda 21 & Sustainable Development

1) From the largest metropolitan cities to the smallest towns of Main Street America, communities all across our nation are being influenced with a new political philosophy known as Sustainable Development and its primary framework for implementation called Agenda 21.

2) Agenda 21 is the global blueprint of implementation for Sustainable Development devised by the United Nations and was signed by 178 world leaders at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 1992.

3) Sustainable Development and Agenda 21 call for a complete re-orientation of the world system of governance in every area in which human impacts on the environment.

4) Sustainable Development, like Communism or Fascism, is a doctrine or philosophy of governance complete with its own agenda, beliefs, and goals.

5) On June 29th, 1993 President Clinton signed Executive Order 12852 creating The President’s Council on Sustainable Development. This step began the full-scale implementation of Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development within the United States of America.

6) Sustainable Development is entrenched throughout our government at every level from federal, state and regional agencies to county, city and community councils and planning boards.

7) Sustainable Development or “Sustainability” is often promoted with the environmental message of “going green”, or “being a good steward” but in reality there is actually a much, much deeper political philosophy of control and governance at work.

8) Sustainable Development is a political philosophy that is built upon three pillars. These three pillars are known as the “3E’s”, or “the triple bottom line”. The three pillars of sustainable development are Ecological Integrity, Economic Prosperity and Social Equity.

9) Sustainable Development demands that the perfect balance of “the triple bottom line” be the deciding lens through which all community development, growth, and decisions are viewed. All growth which fails to achieve this perfect balance is considered unsustainable.

10) Communities are being drawn down the path of Sustainable Development by the lure of numerous monetary grants and incentives from state and federal government agencies as well as non-governmental organizations.

11) Sustainable Development views traditional capitalism and the American way of life as a failing and inequitable system that must be replaced with a new governance system in order to achieve sustainability and a just world.

12) An overwhelming number of businesses and corporations have began shifting to a Sustainable Development operational model and in so doing have rejected the traditional “bottom line” of American Capitalism replacing it with the “triple bottom line” of United Nations Sustainable Development.

13) Almost every College and University in the nation has become indoctrinated with the philosophy of Sustainable Development. From campus infrastructure and administration to student life and the curriculum America’s Colleges and Universities are awash in this radical, collectivist philosophy.

14) The philosophy of Sustainable Development calls for a complete change in the lifestyle of the average American citizen. Numerous aspects of normal American life are subject to intense scrutiny under this radical new philosophy. Where and how we build our homes, what products we use, which foods we eat, what and how much we consume, and which methods of transportation we choose, are just a few examples of American life that United Nations Sustainable Development seeks to bring under its controlling grasp.

15) Sustainable Development and Agenda 21 promote a paradigm shift in attitudes away from the norm of national borders and individual nation-states toward a globalist, collective, one-world, interdependent, and interconnected planetary mindset.

16) Sustainable Development philosophy teaches that mankind is living beyond the “carrying capacity” of the Earth and that we are in the midst of multiple crises that are converging to create conditions that are not livable unless they are halted by a rapid global transition to a sustainable development system. Some of these perceived crises include overpopulation, global poverty and wealth inequality, manmade global climate change, and rampant environmental destruction.

17) Across our nation numerous communities of all sizes are putting into place the radical policies of Sustainable Development and United Nations Agenda 21. From new comprehensive land use plans, to smart growth, and sustainable community planning, the ideas and infrastructure of Sustainable Development are being implemented and added to daily.

18) The policies of sustainable development and Agenda 21 seek to change the way people live and build their cities and towns. Sustainable Development promotes high density, urban, pedestrian oriented, low carbon, walkable communities and discourages traditional American automobile usage, suburban lifestyles and development.

19) The Sustainable Development philosophy perceives the automobile and the ongoing use of fossil fuels as unsustainable.

20) In addition to the high level efforts within the United Nations and other similar globalist organizations, much of the work in promotion of Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development is being carried out by a massive network of Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs). These organizations have been fully consumed by this radical collectivist philosophy and are working overwhelmingly to advance the Sustainable Development Agenda.

21) Sustainable Development and the implementation of Agenda 21 are not some far off future possibility. In fact, America and the world are in the midst of what the sustainable development movement calls “the great transition” to a sustainable new model of living.
dgst77
|
October 04, 2012
Bravo Mr. Graham. It is about time someone made this proposal. There have been at least two incidents where I nearly got hit by someone trying to get around a delivery truck.

I don't believe for a minute that the delivery trucks would stop their deliveries if they were restricted in time or even made to park in the bigger lots. They need the deliveries to make their money. I'm sure they would grumble about it for a while but the city has to consider the shoppers more than anything. An angry, boxed in shopper may not come back to shop; and the city depends on local shoppers as much as on tourists.

Bottom line ... I agree with this proposal and hope it will find sympathetic ears.
petetempleton
|
October 04, 2012
Mr. Graham is simply trying to initiate a conversation about the functionality of N. Main. For those of us who occasionally visit and spend a few bucks in the city, it is important to note that parking and delivery trucks in the city can be a real problem. Let's support Mr. Graham in trying to make things more efficient for shoppers and balance that against the needs of businesses (who need shoppers). There are dozens of ways to improve status quo; but shooting the messenger is not one of them.
llab
|
October 04, 2012
Safety should be first and formost. Keep drivers from driving the wrong way on the wrong side of the roads to park the wrong way. It will be fatal.
llab
|
October 04, 2012
Safety should be first and formost. Keep drivers from driving the wrong way on the wrong side of the road. It will be fatal. Uphold the law about parking on the wrong side of the roads.
llab
|
October 04, 2012
If you want to uphold the law in Surry County, then when will you do something about people parking the wrong way on the wrong side of the roads here, especially in Mount Airy and Pilot Mountain? Have you ever had a car driving head on toward you in your lane just to grab a parking spot on your side of the road to park ilegally? That is the time you slam on the brakes and hope nobody is behind you. How dangerous is that? This also makes you think you're on a one way road. The tourists are even saying how silly this makes the police department look. No other counties do this. If one law is enforced, then all laws should be enforced.
anonymous
|
October 04, 2012
However, Graham argues that no one will be impacted by the proposed limitations on deliveries but the truck drivers themselves.

Genius. Does he think the truck drivers are there simply to irritate his day? News flash... Downtown business couldn't operate without trucks making deliveries. This is the most ignorant thing to come out of the commissioners since Recycling Bins. This is just more Agenda 21 tactics being masked as something else.
pkent
|
October 04, 2012
Mr. Anonymous, this confirms my suspicion that Commissioner Graham was secretly a United Nations Subsversive and was elected primarily to further the Commission on Sustainable Development's Agenda 21 program. Before you pointed this link out, I had mistakenly thought Commissioner Graham was a decent guy who was trying to find a praticle solution to a real world problem and mistakenly thought an open discussion might help.
khewn
|
October 04, 2012
Changing traffic patterns and other proposals have been eyed by Mount Airy officials in recent months as a means of making the downtown area more pedestrian-friendly.

“It all goes along with our plans in the retreat,” Graham said of a city government planning session held during the winter when long-range goals were discussed.

“It’s Step One in that process,” he said of the proposal to limit truck deliveries.

Commissioners also have discussed changes that would promote more outside dining downtown along with tree plantings and other landscaping enhancements.

Sure looks suspicious...I find it hard to believe that business owners don't think it will effect them. He speaks as if the drivers do not matter at all. Many of them are local business owners themselves. But, I digress. This community is dead set on greening itself into nonexistence. Have at it.
khewn
|
October 04, 2012
How stupid? Just because the commissioner was inconvenienced a little he wants to change the way something be done for decades. This sounds like a very liberal way of dealing with things and an absurd abuse of your position Mr. Graham as well as a complete lack of respect the businesses and economy downtown.

Get over it and grow up Commissioner.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: