Fatcow Icon
What is wrong with this picture? USPS picks winners and losers
Sep 21, 2012 | 2161 views | 3 3 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print

A guest editorial from the National Newspaper Association

The newspaper business — both small and large papers — has sounded full-throated opposition this past month about a plan by the U.S. Postal Service to purposely entice advertising out of the newspaper so ads can be placed instead with USPS favored stakeholder Valassis Inc., which bought direct mail company ADVO in 2006.

The goal of USPS is to create more advertising mail. To newspapers that count on advertising to pay its reporters and cover the news, this new venture is beyond alarming. Many think it will push some newspapers — already made fragile by the economy and the Internet — over the edge. If that happens, it is the communities across our country that will feel the most long-term harm.

People have a love-hate relationship with advertising, whether in the newspaper or in the mail. When advertising helps them find deals or shop smartly, they love it. When it doesn’t happen to scratch the shopping itch, they may not like it so much. But most people understand advertising drives the economy and it brings other intangible benefits, like the paying the bill for news coverage that keeps communities informed.

On every level advertising is highly competitive. Local, regional and nationally, newspapers compete with a growing field of ad media, from Internet to television and door hangers to direct mailers.

But now the Postal Service wants to pick winners and losers in this market. It is providing postage rebates to Valassis of more than 30 percent if Valassis can divert more ad inserts into direct mail from newspapers.

Not everyone can play. The discounts can be offered by Valassis only to large national retailers. Newspapers cannot get the same discount for their own mail because they can’t sign one national postage contract, as the direct mail company did, with USPS. Neither can a small clothing or bookstore or a hairdresser or auto parts shop. We — the newspaper and our small businesses — are all local. This deal is only for the big guys.

For the little guys, USPS has another advertising plan that enables businesses to bring unaddressed advertising directly to the post office.

What’s wrong with this picture? It is that USPS isn’t a business. It is owned by Uncle Sam. It exists to serve all. It shouldn’t be picking winners and losers in any marketplace. It shouldn’t be competing with and undercutting its stakeholders, which are all of us. It should deliver the mail that exists, promptly and affordably.

One of USPS’s big goals is to carry even more advertising, as the Internet saps away letters and bills.

But we have to ask ourselves: does America need a federally-owned advertising service? This newspaper says no.



Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Spriamy
|
September 23, 2012
Oh yeah....have you seen your prices for advertising in the paper? It's ridiculous the price for an ad in the paper. The little businesses have to go with the cheapest way to advertise or they can't compete in the marketplace. Come down on ad prices. There may be more advertising.....which I know for a fact determines the amount of pages the paper has in it for that day. Lately the papers are fewer pages because no one can afford the huge price for even a small 2 x 2 ad.
Spriamy
|
September 23, 2012
I guess it would be a surprise to you pkent( below comment)...but the USPS that you are saying sends out crappy advertising, has many valuable employees that have worked 20 years or more! My husband is a rural carrier @ Dobson post office for 27 years. All the full-time carriers there have been there at least 20. People fuss about USPS...but where would you be if you didn't have mail at all? How will you get your social security check if USPS stops? The internet has almost killed the USPS! When people buy from the web and get UPS,or Fedex to deliver, then pay the bill online.....what do those longtime employees get? The shaft???
pkent
|
September 21, 2012
Newspapers which actually focus on providing relevant, accurate, and timely news of all flavors seem to do better than those who have tried to become either a social media element or an mass advertising medium. Those papers which deliver news their market wants to read will be the preferred format compared to the generic marketing crap that shows up in mail boxes or falls out of the local newspaper, especially on Thursdays and Sundays. This newspaper should do a bit of market research and actually measure what this market wants. Shockingly it will be shown that the local market wants local news. Period. The United Postal service can dump tons of advertising in local mail boxes, but its abilty to generate sales will be limited by the fact that many folks simply trash the unaddressed garbage that fills their mail box. Research shows that local news is a valuable comodity and will be supported by advertisers when the "product" meets the needs of the public. The News made a brilliant move many years back when it stopped trying to cover the national news. Its next opportunity will be to master the art of publishing local news, all if it. Competing with generic, unaddressed ad mail should be a no-brainer for the News -- just give us all the local news, including the backstory that rarely gets covered locally because it may be politically incorrect. Unless of course the long-term strategy of Heartland is to provide the minimum in news coverage and instead, simply use the News as a revenue stream built on advertisements. Bottom Line? Build it and they will come; don't build it and the USPS will eat your lunch.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: