Fatcow Icon
Forest services takes control of forest fire fight
by Mondee Tilley
Staff Reporter
Nov 09, 2012 | 7262 views | 6 6 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
<p>Photo courtesy of Lance Leftwich</p><p>Smoke from a forest fire at Pilot Mountain State Park can be seen rising from the tree-covered mountain from the Shoals community south of the peak of the mountain Friday afternoon.</p>

Photo courtesy of Lance Leftwich

Smoke from a forest fire at Pilot Mountain State Park can be seen rising from the tree-covered mountain from the Shoals community south of the peak of the mountain Friday afternoon.

slideshow
<p>Photo courtesy of Lance Leftwich</p><p>From the N.C. 268 overpass with U.S. 52, thick smoke can be seen hovering above Pilot Mountain from a forest fire that’s burned about 100 acres as of Friday afternoon.</p>

Photo courtesy of Lance Leftwich

From the N.C. 268 overpass with U.S. 52, thick smoke can be seen hovering above Pilot Mountain from a forest fire that’s burned about 100 acres as of Friday afternoon.

slideshow

PILOT MOUNTAIN — As of Friday afternoon, about 100 acres have burned at Pilot Mountain State Park, according to Charlie Peek, spokesman for the North Carolina Park Service.

“The North Carolina Forestry Service is taking over the situation. We’ve got about three dozen people up here on the ground, mostly digging hand lines south of the fire. The fire is not moving hardly at all, just smoltering,” said Peek.

The fire got out of control on Thursday and eight area fire departments were called in to help control the blaze. By 8 p.m., the fire, which was a controlled burn to eliminate the potential for a forest fire, had burned three acres, according to John Shelton, director of Surry County Emergency Services.



Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
wewcaj
|
November 10, 2012
sorry" double post.
LonnieCrotts
|
November 10, 2012
The Pilot Mountain, NC fire is not yet out and has already more than quadrupled the planned burn area. The use of "controlled burns" is an oxymoron.

This business of calling a planned burn of forest "Controlled Burn" is perpetuating the myth that people can burn forest land in a controlled manner. The Croatan fire earlier this year was a "controlled fire" planned for 1500 acres and ended up at 21,000 acres. This mistake cost taxpayers $1.2 million dollars.

In addition to the inability to control forest burning, the said reasons for doing so lack merit: reduce danger of wildfires, species/forest restoration, save money by eliminating the extensiveness of wildfires and the cost of extinguishing wildfires.

A growing industry is being built on burning forests. The industry stakeholders include consultants, equipment manufacturers, forest service personnel specialists, helicopter pilots, grant writers, associations, and believe it not supposed nature conservancies.

These stakeholders are busy working to have relevance with their careers/businesses/salaries. This industry is promoting burning and increasing their business share. One plan for burning next year is in the Grandfather District of the Pisgah Forest. The plan is to burn 40,000 acres including 12,000 acres in the Linville Gorge Wilderness. A great wonder is how and who can justify burning the Linville Gorge Wilderness when the "Wilderness" designation's intent is legislate that man can not interfere with this environment; no roads, no vehicles, no chainsaws..., and certainly not pay people to do it. What is going on here and why are we spending public money to support it?

wewcaj
|
November 10, 2012
WHY was this done in the first place...??????? what's the need to burn trees and kill wildlife ??? ..just curious...
wewcaj
|
November 10, 2012
What was the reason to burn down and wildlife ran out and killed ?????
pkent
|
November 10, 2012
Prior to 1988, the Forest Service had a policy of supression of all natural fires..at all costs. Then Yellowstone Park went up in flames and only a miraculous change in weather kept the fire from destroying the most famous and valuable treasures of the park in the Old Faithful Village area. Around that time, the Forest Service realized that stopping all fires allowed the undergrowth and downed "kindling" to accumulate to the point that massive fires were doing more danger than periodic fires that had kept the damage to a more natural level. That is about the time the Farest Service and Park Service studied and created our current "controlled burn" approach. Research and data from the past twenty years has shown that this approach most nearly reflects the natural patterns of natural fires AND results in the least damage, cost and risk to the public. I say this is the most cost-effective means of rationally dealing with a natural process that has the potential of terrific damage if not managed in some way. Kudo's to the Forest Service and Park Service for what they do. No human endeavor is perfect, so let's cut them a little slack when the best plans go off track.
brinafair
|
November 09, 2012
*smoldering
Featured Businesses